MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7018186429

Cover crops for early season weed suppression in corn

2021· dissertation· en· W7018186429 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueK-State Research Exchange (Kansas State University) · 2021
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicWeed Control and Herbicide Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWeedCover cropCover (algebra)Zea maysCrop yieldWeed control
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Integrated weed management is becoming more important to prevent herbicide-resistant weeds from reducing corn yield.This study examined the influence various combinations of cover crop species, termination timing, and N rate had on early-season weed suppression and corn yield at Manhattan and Ottawa in 2019 and 2020.Fall cover crops of triticale (x Triticosecale Wittm.), pea (Pisum sativum L.), and triticale + pea (mixed) were sown in November 2018 and 2019, with the exception of pea sown in spring 2019.Two cover crop termination timings, three weeks before (3WBP) or at corn planting (AP), were subplot factors.The sub-subplot factor was N broadcast applied as urea at rates of 100 or 168 kg N ha -1 within two weeks after planting in both years.Cover crops were terminated and no-cover treatments were treated with glyphosate and 2,4-D.Cover crop biomass was collected at termination and weed density was counted regularly from 3WBP through the POST herbicide application of atrazine, glyphosate, and mesotrione at three weeks after planting.Weed density and biomass were collected in August 2020 to quantify control by the POST application.Cover crop biomass production ranged from 2,500 to 7,600 kg ha -1 in the mixed and triticale treatments when terminated AP in both years.Weed density was influenced by cover crop species and termination time at Manhattan with reductions of 51 to 59% by using cover crops compared to no cover and 44% when terminated AP compared to 3WBP.There was no reduction in weed density at Ottawa by delay in termination timing, likely due to little cover crop biomass production.Yield was variable between the two locations.Delay in termination timing and the triticale cover crop reduced yield at Manhattan in both years by 14 to 19%.At Ottawa, a 15% increase in yield was observed when termination timing was delayed from 3WBP to AP, and yield increased by 11% with increased fertilizer applied from 100 to 168 kg N ha -1 , regardless of cover crop type.Results indicated that cover crops generated varying results over different regions, soil types, and field management histories, as was exemplified by the locations of this study.Data from this study suggest that using a cover crop species that has high biomass production and corn fertilization with a minimum of 168 kg N ha -1 will result in greater weed suppression and less corn yield loss than cover crop treatments fertilized with 100 kg N ha -1 .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.721
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it