MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7018344474

Decision making for urban mobility: a macro, meso and micro analysis

2020· dissertation· en· W7018344474 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueSpectrum Research Repository (Concordia University) · 2020
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUrban Design and Spatial Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeocodingMacroTask (project management)AnalyticsVisualizationTraffic congestionUrban areaMegacityData visualizationGeospatial analysis
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Urban congestion is a challenge that cities commonly suffer across the globe. Traffic congestion and longer commutes are linked with poor cardiovascular and metabolic health, along with decreased energy and increased stress among the users. This is further translated into productivity and economic loss, an increase in health service expenses and a general decrease in the quality of social wellbeing. 
\nTo improve this condition, the municipality administration has the role of implementing solutions to strategically address urban mobility. However, this is a complex task to achieve and normally involves limited resources, which make real-world deployments have a great inherited risk. Thus, decision-making is a task that has to be carefully addressed by different factors and scales. 
\nThis thesis approaches multiple tools for analytics on urban mobility using skills in SQL, R and Python, and open-source software such as QGIS for spatial analysis and SUMO (Simulation of Urban Mobility) for microsimulation. The methodology includes the analysis of urban mobility in Montreal from different levels of analysis.
\nAt the macro level, the MTL Trajet dataset provides insight of mobility behaviour of participants through their trip coordinates. Using geometry datasets of quarter and boroughs of Montreal, the analysis is framed and processed via SQL and QGIS. Data visualization is presented in Choropleth maps, Flow maps and Chord diagrams using origin and destination of trips. Supporting processing task such as reverse geocoding to join attributes between datasets are used. The macro analysis helps to identify a primary area of analysis seeking the most transited region. The quarter of René-Lévesque in/and the borough of Ville-Marie are the most accessed areas in this study. 
\nIn the meso level, street network information from OpenStreetMap allows making relations among the elements of the area, such as universities and their proximity to pedestrian zones. Resulting maps aid decision-making from a meso perspective, choosing the area of Concordia University as a suitable space for microfocus.
\nAt the micro-level, four areas of opportunity interpreted as transit policy-testing were identified. A custom micro-network and synthetic demand for this area were used to simulate the impacts of these scenarios. The measures tested to improve urban mobility in the area are the restriction of street lanes for specific vehicle types and the inclusion of pedestrian areas. Experimentations with different levels of user modal share and shift are presented.
\nResults of macro, meso and micro analyses are included to provide recommendations for the administration of the city of Montreal. The inclusion of multiple restrained lanes for buses and high-occupancy vehicles around Concordia University and a pedestrian zone will allow to save time to road users, as long as single-passenger vehicle shifts towards public transit and shared–vehicles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.362
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it