The Effects of English-Speaking in the Household and Immigrant Heritage on Eating Disorder Symptomatology Among Canadian Women & Men
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
English-speaking in the household and immigrant heritage were investigated as predictors of eating disorder symptomatology. Subsamples of immigrants (n = 72) and native-born Canadians (n = 314) were analyzed. Each \nsubsample had approximately equal numbers of men and women. Respondents in English-speaking households reported a higher tendency to think about dieting than respondents in non-English-speaking households. Immigrant men reported a higher tendency to think about dieting and a higher tendency to feel satisfied with the shape of their body than native-born Canadian men. \nImmigrant women, however, showed the opposite trend. They reported thinking about dieting to a lesser degree than native-born Canadian women. In contrast to immigrant men, immigrant women appear to be 'insulated' from Western cultural body ideals and standards. This study increases our understanding of \nfactors that might affect the health of Canadian women and men, particularly immigrants, raises important implications for health promotion research, practice and policy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it