MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7028171451

Equivariant Modules

2015· dissertation· en· W7028171451 on OpenAlexafffund

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace (University of Toronto) · 2015
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicProbability and Statistical Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsEquivariant mapEquivariant cohomologyPolynomial ringProjective moduleAlgebra over a fieldCohomologyResolution (logic)Flat moduleVector bundle
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A module $N$ over a ring $A$ is a $G$-equivariant module if $N$ is also a representation of $G$ in a way compatible with the module structure. The lattice of an equivariant module is a convenient way to describe an equivariant module. We introduce an explicit elementary technique for understanding the lattice of equivariant modules. Then we apply this technique to two questions related to equivariant modules. \nIn Chapter 2 we work with equivariant modules for $\\GL(V)$ acting on the polynomial ring $R=\\Sym V$. We introduce for every partition $\\lambda$ the elementary equivariant module $M_{\\lambda}$. Then we prove that any finitely generated equivariant module admits a filtration with associated graded being the direct sum of modules of only two kinds: either $M_{\\lambda}$ or truncations of $M_{\\lambda}$. We use our technique to show that each $M_{\\lambda}$ has a linear resolution and describe also the resolution of its truncations.\nIn Chapter 3 we look at a family of equivariant complexes. One can find this family in the appendix of the famous book by D. Eisenbud "Commutative Algebra with a View Towards Algebraic Geometry". This family includes the Eagon-Northcott and Buschsbaum-Rim complexes. Our objective is to study this family, and, in particular, refine the knowledge of its cohomology.\nFirst, we obtain these complexes from the derived images of twists of the Koszul complex on the projective space. This idea apparently goes back to Kempf [1970]. Taking this "geometric" point of view, we interpret the cohomology of these complexes as the cohomology of certain vector bundles on projective space, and proceed with calculations. Our technique allows us to describe the lattice of cohomology as an equivariant module.\nFinally, we put the above complexes in the realm of tilting theory: non-exactness of this family in certain regions can be seen as a failure of the exceptional sequence of line bundles on the projective space to lift to an exceptional sequence on a certain vector bundle. This observation creates a curious contrast with the results of Buchweitz-Leushke-Van den Bergh, stating that the exceptional sequence of twisted differential forms does lift to an exceptional sequence on the same vector bundle.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.061

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.085
GPT teacher head0.368
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpace (University of Toronto)Same topicProbability and Statistical ResearchFrench-language works237,207