Metacomprensión y desarrollo cognitivo en la autorregulación del aprendizaje del adolescente
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: Mental processes are fundamental in the learning of adolescents, with the development of cognition and metacognition being relevant to improve self-regulation, specifically in the metacomprehensive modality and its components: Planning, Monitoring, Evaluation, and Conditional Knowledge. Objective: To analyze the mental processes that enable metacomprehension in the cognitive development of adolescents in educational institutions in Colombia. Methodology: Quantitative approach with a non-experimental cross-sectional design and correlational scope. The MAI –Metacognitive Skills Inventory– and MoCA –Montreal Cognitive Assessment– instruments were applied to a population of 407 high school students from rural and urban areas in different regions of Colombia. Results: The main findings regarding metacomprehension and cognitive development were reflected in the majority of students’ ability to evaluate their learning process using different metacognitive strategies. Likewise, they plan their academic activities, organize their study time, enabling them to solve problems, prioritize goals, and select the best tools; they know how to monitor their learning processes during task development and adjust them to improve performance. Conclusions: Metacognition, in its metacomprehensive modality, is one of the most relevant processes in Learning Self-Regulation, allowing adolescents to be aware of how and to what extent they learn, enabling the execution of processes such as planning, monitoring, control, and self-evaluation of learning, which are closely related to the variable of cognitive development of attention and its subprocesses: orientation, concentration, and flexibility.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it