Quelle politique pour répondre aux discriminations à l'université ?
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La formule “équité diversité inclusion” (EDI) semble s’imposer comme nouvelle norme institutionnelle, venue à la fois d’Amérique du Nord et du monde de l’entreprise, en réponse à la demande sociale d’en finir avec les inégalités et la discrimination. Les universités, et en particulier l’UCLouvain, l’adoptent (après bien d’autres au Canada, en France, etc.). Certes, la formulation bienveillante et positive de l’EDI – pour la diversité et l’inclusion plutôt que contre la discrimination – vise à rassembler sans effrayer. Mais elle peut aussi faire écran à la nature des problèmes, ancrés dans des rapports de domination et d’oppression inscrits dans les structures et l’histoire des institutions universitaires, et plus largement de nos sociétés.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.007 | 0.013 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it