MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7033568620

Review of <i>Wild Prairie: A Photographer's Personal Journey</i> By James R. Page

2007· article· en· W7033568620 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueInsecta mundi · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicQuasicrystal Structures and Properties
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNoticeRange (aeronautics)Period (music)Performance artLocal color
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The landscape of the prairie is often overlooked in favor of more dramatic mountain ranges and wild forests, yet it is an ecosystem teaming with life and beauty. Grasslands are the backbone of our planet, but to appreciate the prairie takes time. Photographer James R. Page immersed himself in the prairie to observe and understand its vastness and subtleties, using his camera to record his vision. He shares these photographs, and thoughtfully written observations, in his US-page book, Wild Prairie: A Photographer's Personal Journey.\nEarly in the text, Page states that "Everything on the prairie seems either" huge or impossibly small." This is the approach he has taken with his camera. We are shown the seemingly infinite vistas one sees while gazing at the horizon, juxtaposed with the micro details you might notice when your attention shifts to examine the ground where you're standing. The book is divided into four chapters, each devoted to a season. Beginning with summer, we journey through a year of changes, made even more dramatic as our range encompasses 1,500 miles of grasslands from Texas to Saskatchewan. We see the plants grow, die or go dormant, and sprout again. We see birds, animals, insects, and reptiles. We see the light change. We begin to realize how beautiful and complex the prairie can be.\nThe original North American prairie once stretched south from around modern-day Dallas, 1,500 miles north to southern Saskatchewan, and east to west from Indiana to the Rockies, covering approximately 896 million acres. The plow and urban development have claimed much of the land, and today less than four percent of that prairie remains, with much of that broken into small isolated parcels. It is sometimes easy for a photographer to romanticize or give a slightly prejudiced viewpoint. This book mentions that humans have profoundly altered the prairie, yet there is a conspicuous absence of them, except for the occasional abandoned ruin of a building, or a road without a trace of traffic. Likewise, there are photos that make you question if this is really the prairie-exceptions rather than the typical. Perhaps this is to make us aware that surprises exist, that the more we look the more we will see.\nWild Prairie: A Photographer's Personal Journey gives a glimpse of the prairie. The photographs are beautiful, the prose is descriptive. No photograph can ever completely duplicate an experience, but an effective one can give a sense of that experience and make us more aware. Page's photographs encourage us to take it upon ourselves to explore, embrace, and cherish the land.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.829
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it