MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7033569603

Resectoscopic correction of the "isthmocele" in women with postmenstrual abnormal uterine bleeding and secondary infertility

2008· article· en· W7033569603 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueArchivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMathematics, Computing, and Information Processing
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLithotomy positionHysteroscopyLaparotomyRetchingPregnancy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

STUDY OBJECTIVE:
\n
\nThe obstetric complications that a cesarean delivery may produce have been known and studied for a long time. In the last few years, new correlations with some gynecologic disturbances also emerged, such as postmenstrual abnormal uterine bleeding (PAUB), and with some cases of secondary infertility. This is due to the presence of a diverticulum on the anterior wall of the uterine isthmus or of the cervical canal at the site of a previous cesarean delivery scar. The aim of our study was to assess the effectiveness of a hysteroscopic surgical technique to correct this anatomic defect and therefore eliminate the symptoms.
\nDESIGN:
\n
\nA prospective study (Canadian Task Force classification III).
\nSETTING:
\n
\nPrivate clinic and university hospital.
\nPATIENTS:
\n
\nTwenty-six patients who previously had 1 or more cesarean deliveries, were evaluated from 2001 to 2005 for postmenstrual uterine bleeding and secondary infertility in 9 patients. All patients had a "niche" (which we defined as "isthmocele") principally on the isthmus-superior third of cervical canal (18/26), but on the lower cervical tract too (8/26). All of them underwent resectoscopic correction of the "isthmocele."
\nINTERVENTIONS:
\n
\nHysteroscopic resection of the edges and the bottom of the defect until the complete removal of the fibrotic scar tissue showing the muscular tissue below, using a cutting loop and pure cutting current. Aimed electrocoagulation of the bottom of the pouch with a roller-ball to avoid the in situ production of blood.
\nMEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:
\n
\nThe anatomic defect in 100% of patients treated (26/26) was repaired, thus solving the symptom. Seven of 9 patients with secondary infertility became pregnant.
\nCONCLUSIONS:
\n
\nThe "isthmocele" represents a possible consequence of one or more cesarean deliveries and may be symptomatic in some women. It is a defect that can be easily diagnosed by hysteroscopy and successfully treated by resectoscopic technique.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.312
Threshold uncertainty score0.622

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it