MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7033650998

Relationship between gluten strength and free asparagine content of Canadian wheat varieties

2022· dissertation· en· W7033650998 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueMspace (University of Manitoba) · 2022
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicBrazilian Legal Issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFarinographRheologyAsparagineSofteningGlutenGluteninGluten free
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The free amino acid asparagine is the main precursor to formation of acrylamide, a probable carcinogen, in bakery products. Therefore, it is critical to understand if reducing free asparagine in wheat will be detrimental to dough viscoelasticity, and consequently, to the quality of the bread made from the dough. Thus, this study aimed to investigate how factors affecting free asparagine levels in wheat, i.e., environment, genotype, and fertilization treatments, affected dough rheological properties. Because good gluten strength is necessary for good bread quality, this study sought to understand the relationship between wheat free asparagine concentration and gluten strength. Eight commercial Canadian wheat varieties were grown at four site-years under four fertilization treatments, i.e., combinations of two levels of nitrogen and two levels of sulfur. Wheat grain samples were milled into whole-wheat and straight grade flour. Free asparagine concentration was quantified using whole-wheat flours and dough rheological properties were measured using straight grade flours. Empirical dough rheological properties were evaluated using the Brabender Farinograph and the Brabender Extensograph. Using a subset of 10 selected samples, shear rheometry and low-intensity ultrasound (LIU) tests were performed on yeasted and non-yeasted doughs. From empirical tests, it was observed that environment, genotype and their interaction were the main factors affecting gluten strength, with little effect from fertilization. Additionally, gluten strength parameters were negatively correlated to wheat free asparagine concentration. When evaluated under linear shear oscillatory tests, non-yeasted dough rheology significantly changed over time, while prominent dough softening was observed during fermentation of yeasted doughs. When tested under creep-recovery and stress relaxation, a strong negative correlation was observed between wheat free asparagine concentration and gluten strength. Finally, LIU provided meaningful information on dough rheological properties, with similar outcomes compared to shear tests. LIU results showed bubble disproportionation happened to a greater extent in samples with higher free asparagine concentration and protein content, samples that were hypothesized to have higher gliadin-to-glutenin ratios. In conclusion, selecting wheat varieties with low levels of free asparagine and applying commercial levels of nitrogen fertilization are good strategies to produce safe and high-quality wheat, with no detrimental effects on gluten strength.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.244
Threshold uncertainty score0.868

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it