MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7033730257

The role of financial literacy and fraud awareness in strengthening self-managed superannuation funds (SMSFs)

2022· other· en· W7033730257 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueRUNE (Research UNE) · 2022
Typeother
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDevelopment, Ethics, and Society
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFinancial literacyQuarter (Canadian coin)LiteracyTest (biology)Vulnerability (computing)Financial services
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In 2020, Australians reported losses of over AUD$851 million to fraud (ACCC, 2021b). This was up from AUD$634 million in 2019 (ACCC, 2020b), and is expected to increase further in 2021. Fraud is characterised by the use deception for financial gain. Offenders employ a variety of techniques to successfully gain large amounts of money from victims. Offenders will coerce and persuade victims to send money taken from savings accounts, lines of credit, bank loans, and borrowing from family and/or friends. In a small number of cases, offenders will also coax victims to withdraw money from their self-managed superannuation funds (SMSFs).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.051
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.047

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.051
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.378
Teacher spread0.342 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRUNE (Research UNE)Same topicDevelopment, Ethics, and SocietyFrench-language works237,207