MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7033885884

Slow Pyrolysis of Vomitoxin-Contaminated Corn in a Batch Reactor

2021· article· en· W7033885884 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueScholarship@Western (Western University) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDiverse Topics in Contemporary Research
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPyrolysisLevoglucosanContaminationMycotoxinRaw materialYield (engineering)FusariumBatch reactor
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Maize is one of the most important agricultural products in terms of production, consumption, and economic importance. However, its contamination with mycotoxins, particularly deoxynivalenol (DON), frequently occurs around the world due to high humidity. This mycotoxin appears predominantly in grains associated primarily with pathogens such as Fusarium graminearum (Gibberella zeae) or Fusarium culmorum. This phenomenon, threatening both human and animal health, also affects the economy due to the disposal of large amounts of contaminated corn. The overall objectives of this study were to use thermochemical conversions (i.e. pyrolysis) for managing this seasonal waste by converting it into value-added industrial solid (bio-char), liquid (bio-oil) and gaseous products. The pyrolysis of vomitoxin-corn grains was carried out in a bench-scale batch reactor at temperatures between 450 to 650 °C with 15 to 20 °C/min heating rates and without carrier gas.\nPyrolysis resulted in the deterioration of deoxynivalenol (DON) from 5-7 ppm in raw corn grains to zero ppm in the treated biochar, making thermochemical conversion a promising method for industrial applications.\nThe effect of pyrolysis conditions, including temperature and heating rate, on the conversion of toxic corn grains, was investigated. The results showed the maximum bio-oil yield was achieved at 650 °C (47 wt.%). Bio-char and non-condensable gases were two other products with 28.6 wt.% and 24.5 wt.% yields, respectively.\nFurther, the chemical composition of the bio-oil was identified using Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS) and quantified by High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC). The results showed that acetic acid and levoglucosan are the two major components in the bio-oil, which were measured to be 26 g/kg, and 13 g/kg of bio-oil, respectively. Both acetic acid and levoglucosan have potential applications in various industries, such as for the synthesis of polymers, solvents, and pharmaceuticals.\nThe bio-chars were analyzed using TGA for proximate analysis, FTIR for identification of significant functional groups, BET for surface area, SEM for measuring the development of the pores, and elemental analysis for CHNS content. Bio-char was upgraded by physical activation using a CO2 at 900 °C. Activation significantly increased the BET surface area of the bio-char from 3 to 419 m2g-1. The significant development of the pore structure was verified through SEM images. The performance of activated bio-char has been tested by utilizing three different model molecules, i.e. methylene blue, methyl orange, and ibuprofen. The results showed that adsorption capacity of the activated bio-char was similar to that of commercial activated carbons (CAC).\nThe gas composition from pyrolysis of corn was analyzed via micro-GC to investigate the potential use of gases as a renewable energy resource for combustion in engines or as for process energy recovery.\nIn this study, we demonstrated a successful process for eliminating DON from contaminated corn via pyrolysis, while producing value-added products.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.162
GPT teacher head0.373
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it