MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7034333060

Surviving online learning handbook: what does COVID teach us about online learning in high schools?

2021· dissertation· en· W7034333060 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueK-State Research Exchange (Kansas State University) · 2021
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSeismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOnline learningQuarter (Canadian coin)FeelingOnline communityOnline participationCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)PerceptionOnline discussionEducational technology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Unlike many disaster scenarios, there was no guidebook for school communities to consult as they wrestled with the ensuing fallout of a global pandemic.This emergency offered educational policy makers a rare opportunity to not only evaluate current attitudes towards online learning, but also discuss the realities and impacts of large-scale educational transitions from traditional classrooms to fully online environments-particularly in K-12 environments.The purpose of this research is to explore the perceptions of online learning within a high school learning community in response to their district's implementation of online learning following the outbreak of COV-19 to help better inform and shape the future development and implementation of online learning opportunities.This research is designed around a collective case study framework using semi-structured interviews and surveys of students, parents, teachers, and administrators in a midwestern suburban high school starting during the 4th quarter of the 2019-20 school year through the first semester of the 2020-21 school year.Data from these methods was compared and contrasted between cases and emergent themes were then interpreted alongside evidenced trends in recent research in online learning and concepts related to forced second-order change spurred by the COVID-19 pandemic.These shared findings were then organized into suggested survival tips for schools to consider during future implementations of online learning.Experiences from interviews and perceptions from surveys reveal a number of shared feelings in the learning community related to certain advantages and disadvantages of online environments, perceived higher workloads and anxiety, potential factors that help and inhibit success in online environments, and obstacles for students who rely on extra support services.All interest groups agreed that some students thrived in online environments, though many did not.Ultimately, all interest groups largely agreed their overall perceptions of online learning improved over the course of implementation, and a majority of the school community wanted more online opportunities offered to students even when school returned back to normal.Hopefully these findings convince educational leaders to reconsider the promising potential roles of online learning in K-12 settings as school communities inevitably transition back into classroom environments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.782
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it