De la hache à la tronçonneuse : transformations, résistances et évolution du rapport au territoire chez les Cris de la Baie James (Québec)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Through an ethnographic approach, characterized by a long and inductive fieldwork, the author of this thesis analyses the transformations faced by the Cree of James Bay (Northern Quebec) following the agreement called the "Peace of the Braves ". The latter, signed in 2002, approved the Eastmain-Rupert hydroelectric project and redefined the partnership between the Cree, the State, Hydro-Québec and various other economic actors. The research displays the multiple aspects of this redefinition, characterized by a renewed relationship between the Crees and their territory, which can be seen as the matrix of their identity. As much their involvement in the megaprojects of resource exploitation as the persistence of their animist ontology and their hunting practices are analyzed. Based on a meticulous and nuanced portrait of the inhabitants of Nemaska, the study also questions the global issues (ontological, social and economic) of territorial agreements and the consequences for Aboriginal people of their increasing integration in the neoliberal model of a globalized Canada.
Stored with the screening record, where it is evidence for the labels above.
How this classification was reachedexpand
The three-model screen
all 5,600 screened works →All three models called this out of scope.
Ethnographic thesis on transformations in the Cree of James Bay's relationship to territory after a hydroelectric agreement.
It ethnographically studies Cree territorial relations and resource development, not research practice.
Ethnography of Cree territory relations after a hydro agreement; Indigenous studies, not research-as-object.
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".