MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7042584805

Pierre Bergeron and early modern travel writing (the accounts of Jean Mocquet, François Pyrard de Laval and Vincent Le Blanc)

2006· other· fr· W7042584805 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueOpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique) · 2006
Typeother
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicTechnology, Environment, Urban Planning
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTravel writingLigneDecadenceContext (archaeology)The Renaissance
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L'étude de la carrière d'un scribe de la littérature des voyages permet de mieux comprendre quels étaient les enjeux de la composition d'un récit de voyage à la fin de la Renaissance. Depuis la transcription des mémoires des voyageurs jusqu'à l'édition finale de l'imprimé, Pierre Bergeron a façonné les témoignages de Pyrard, Mocquet et Le Blanc afin de les rendre publiables. La réécriture des récits de voyages répond en partie à un objectif militant, fondant une rhétorique de la propagande coloniale, sans toutefois s'y réduire. Entre l'enquête objective et le témoignage romanesque, les récits remaniés par Pierre Bergeron sont une source d'information scientifique mais aussi de divertissement pour les curieux. Analyser les pratiques éditoriales de Pierre Bergeron aide en définitive à mieux comprendre la culture scientifique et littéraire de l'automne de la Renaissance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.911
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it