MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7043905538

Une histoire du spleen français au XVIIIe siècle - la transmission, évolution et naturalisation d'un fait anglais

2010· other· en· W7043905538 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueLibrary and Archives Canada (Government of Canada) · 2010
Typeother
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicWeb Application Security Vulnerabilities
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNaturalisationContext (archaeology)LexemeConsecrationConstruct (python library)Term (time)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The history of the French notion of spleen originates in the linguistic and conceptual adoption thereof over the course of the 18th century. This thesis presents spleen as a discursive construct formed by the writing of its time, and thus takes into account the socio-historic context which surrounded its transmission from English to French culture. Accordingly, the beginning of the 18th century saw the introduction of spleen facilitated by a number of texts which presented the concept without naming it as such. This is followed by the first known textual occurrence of the term in French in 1745. An analysis of the term's occurrences thereafter reveals the semantic richness representative of spleen's gradual conceptual development and illustrates the process of naturalisation which in 1798 led to the consecration of the term "Spleen" by the Dictionnaire de l'Académie française.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.817
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.002
GPT teacher head0.146
Teacher spread0.144 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it