Examining the growth and nitrogen economy of organically selected spring wheat cultivars
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The nitrogen uptake of organically selected and conventional spring wheat cultivars was assessed throughout the growing season. High protein yielding advanced lines were selected from the Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada and the University of Manitoba’s joint organic breeding program. The organic breeding lines were compared with conventional check cultivars. The organic lines were found to have higher average yield, grain N yield, kernel density, HI, and NHI while the check cultivars were found to have higher average grain protein. No significant differences were observed between organic lines and the check cultivars for biomass and N biomass accumulation. The strong performance of the organic breeding lines compared to their conventional counterparts for several key parameters is a positive indication of the benefits of specialized breeding programs. The higher yield of the organic lines indicated that they were better able to cope with the environmental stresses associated with organic growing conditions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it