Transition from manual to power wheelchair - experiences of persons with Multiple Sclerosis.
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction:During the course of their disease, persons with multiple sclerosis experience restrictions to their mobility that impact on their occupational engagement. Little is known about how persons with multiple sclerosis experience the transition from manual to power wheelchair. Aim:To describe how persons with multiple sclerosis experience the transition from a manual to a power wheelchair, and how this transition affects their occupational engagement. Method: Five persons with multiple sclerosis who had transitioned to a power wheelchair within the previous 36 months participated in semi-structured interviews. The interviews were analysed through qualitative content analysis supported by the framework of the Canadian Model of Occupational Performance and Engagement. Findings:Transition to a power wheelchair improved the participants’ ability to get around, their comfort sitting, and fatigue level. These improvements led to increased occupational engagement, primarily related to leisure activities. The timing of the transition was perceived as an important aspect. Conclusions: A gradual introduction to a power wheelchair earlier in the disease course could facilitate acceptance and help maintain occupational engagement. Significance: The occupational therapist has an important role in raising an early dialogue to find the right timing and processes for transition to power wheelchair to support occupational engagement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.044 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it