MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7054841384

Bayesian Inference of Stochastic Degradation Models: A Likelihood-Free Approach

2021· dissertation· en· W7054841384 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUWSpace (University of Waterloo) · 2021
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLaser Design and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRandomnessGibbs samplingMarkov chain Monte CarloMonte Carlo methodBayesian probabilityApproximate Bayesian computationBayesian inferenceContext (archaeology)Estimation theory
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The structural integrity and system performance of large engineering systems are adversely affected by various forms of degradation mechanisms. Modeling of such mechanisms is accomplished by collecting degradation data from periodic in-service inspections of structures and components. Subsequently, the degradation prediction is transformed into system and component lifetimes that are necessary inputs into the risk-based life-cycle management of critical structures. Stochastic degradation models are widely applicable for predicting degradation growths in structural components. The statistical estimation of such models is often challenged by various uncertainties, such as inherent randomness of a degradation process, parameter uncertainty due to noise in measurements, coverage issues, probe signal loss, the limited resolution of the inspection probe, and small sample size.
\nThe Bayesian inference method can be used to quantify the uncertainties of the model parameters. However, degradation data of engineering structures are often contaminated by a significant amount of inspection errors added by various inspection tools. As a result, the likelihood function becomes analytically intractable and computationally expensive to a degree that any traditional likelihood-based Bayesian inference scheme (e.g., Gibbs Sampler, Metropolis-Hastings sampler) turns difficult for practical use.
\nThis study proposes a practical likelihood-free approach for parameter estimation based on the approximate Bayesian computation (ABC) method. ABC is a simulation-based approach that does not require an explicit formulation of the likelihood function. Three advanced computational algorithms, namely, ABC using Markov chain Monte Carlo (ABC-MCMC), ABC using Hamiltonian Monte Carlo (ABC-HMC), and ABC using subset simulation (ABC-SS), are developed and implemented for the parameter estimation task. In the context of degradation modeling, various implementation issues of these algorithms are discussed in detail.
\nTo improve the mixing properties of ABC-MCMC, a new ABC algorithm is derived based on the HMC sampler that uses the Hamiltonian dynamics to simulate new samples from its seed samples. Its non-random walk behavior helps to explore the target probability space more effectively and efficiently than the standard random-walk MCMC method. The convergence of the proposed ABC-HMC algorithm is proved by satisfying the detailed balance equation, and its efficacy is verified using a numerical example. Furthermore, A new sequential ABC algorithm is proposed to deal with highly diffused priors in a Bayesian inference problem. The proposed ABC algorithm is based on the subset simulation method and a modified HMC algorithm. With faster convergence, the new algorithm turns out to be a powerful method to sample from a complex multi-modal target density as shown by a numerical example. The applicability of the proposed algorithm is further extended by transforming it into a likelihood-free Bayesian model selection tool.
\nThe proposed likelihood-free approach for Bayesian inference is applied to analyze practical data sets from the Canadian nuclear power plants. The practical data consist of two types of degradation measurements: (1) wall thickness data of the feeder pipes that are affected by the flow-accelerated corrosion (FAC) and (2) data from the steam generator tubes affected by the pitting corrosion. Four popular stochastic degradation models are considered, namely, the random rate model, the gamma process model, the mixed-effects regression model, and the Poisson process model, for characterizing the degradation processes under study. In the modeling process, various inspection uncertainties, such as the sizing error, the coverage error, and the probability of detection (POD) error are taken into account. The numerical results demonstrate that, in comparison to the likelihood-based approach, the proposed likelihood-free approach notably reduces computational time while accurately estimating the model parameters. This study finds that these intuitive and easy-to-implement likelihood-free algorithms are versatile tools for Bayesian inference of stochastic degradation models and a promising alternative to the traditional Bayesian estimation methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.023
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.036

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.023
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUWSpace (University of Waterloo)Same topicLaser Design and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207