MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7061672198

Seasonal Population Fluctuation of White-throated Swifts at Roost Sites in Southern California

2003· article· en· W7061672198 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDigital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida) · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Power Generation Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPopulationSeasonalityEctothermPopulation density
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In southern California, White-throated Swift (Aeronautes saxatalis) roosts contain many more individuals during the winter months than during the breeding season.Dates of the high and low counts at these roosts fluctuate from site to site and from year to year.Evidence suggests that some individuals remain and nest at or near the roost; whether others migrate north to breeding areas remains unknown.The White-throated Swift (Aeronautes saxatalis) is widespread in much of western North America, where its bold patterning, loud vocalizations, and aerial habits make it easily detected and identified.It occurs year round in southern California as well as from central California, central Arizona, southern New Mexico, and southwestern Texas south to Oaxaca, Mexico (AOU 1998).It is a breeding summer resident only northward along the Pacific coast to northern California and inland to eastern Oregon, southern interior British Columbia, and southern Alberta (AOU 1998, Ryan and Collins 2000).Little detailed information about White-throated Swift migration (Hughes 1998, Ryan and Collins 2000)is available.The species is absent from the more northerly parts of its range for many months, in British Columbia, for example, from mid August to early April (Campbell et al. 1990, Goward et al. 1995).Grinnell and Miller (1944) and Small (1994) suggested that in California the White-throated Swift is more common and widespread in summer.Garrett and Dunn (1981) stated that in southern California, "this species appears more irregularly and in lesser numbers in most areas in winter, although large concentrations may still be found in some coastal and desert areas."White-throated Swifts nest and roost in narrow horizontal or vertical cracks and crevices in rocky cliffs (including sea cliffs) and rock quarries (Hanna 1909, 1917, Bent 1940, Anderson 1943).They also adopt manmade structures such as buildings (Yocum 1966, Collins and Johnson 1982), freeway overpasses, and bridges (Ryan and Collins 2000).Little is known, however, about their specific requirements for roost sites or nest sites.In this study we examine seasonal fluctuations in the populations of Whitethroated Swifts at roost sites in southern California by describing the attendance of swifts at three year-round roosts and making comparisons between breeding and winter periods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.120
Threshold uncertainty score0.238

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.172
Teacher spread0.160 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDigital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida)Same topicAdvanced Power Generation TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207