MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7064123606

Alternative Futures: Envisioning Bolzano, Italy

2023· article· en· W7064123606 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueView · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicX-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMainstreamHumanityWildernessPerspective (graphical)Urban planningZoningCityscapeSet (abstract data type)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

When we talk about cities, the first thing that pops up in our minds is functional concrete blocks with vehicle-demarcating urban zoning. As humans yearn to be in nature, we could have other choices where citizens and trees demarcate city zoning instead of vehicles, a city that could be beautiful, natural, and sustainable, an alternative to the current polluted, noisy, exclusive, and alienating cities. Many urban dwellers have attempted to make a living in dominant global multicultural, fractured, cosmopolitan, and highly varied environments over the past century, where difference, not homogeneity, is the rule. Yet, mainstream urban planning problematizes the city's increasing heterogeneity and the tensions and conflicts that come with it in an effort to control the urban wilderness through policies and plans. According to this perspective, today's metropolis is "divided," "unsafe," and made up of "the underclass" and "the poor".1 However, many writers, urbanist, and philosophers, talked about the importance of changing the nature of how we approach cities by integrating nature into our urban fabric, and how this could be of a benefit to our ecology, biodiversity, and our personal well-being. Some theorists approached these ideas from a sociological perspective like Lefebvre and the notion of space production. Others approached the concept in a form of a science fiction, like the Canadian novelist Margret Atwood in her 2009 novel “The Year of the Flood”, where it is set in a post-apocalyptic world where most of humanity has been wiped out by a pandemic. The remaining survivors live in a self-sustaining, ecological community called God's Gardeners, who prioritize living in harmony with the natural world. The novel explores themes of environmentalism, genetic engineering, and the relationship between humans and other species.2 This paper looks into alternatives of how we could approach our cities from a speculative design perspective before hindering into policies. In specific, this paper looks at Bolzano-Bozen in Italy and what are the other alternatives that we could have in some specific neighbourhoods. Our research focuses on developing a visual narrative of city streets where citizens gain back their cities by endorsing healthy public spaces and by showing how streets could be safer for all. For this research, we used collages, AI aided technologies, and renderings to imagine a different outcome for our city streets. Moreover, we collect and highlight the main ideas into approach a sustainable eco social utopia collected form wide range of academics and writers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.537
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it