MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7064222719

Auralisation: A Valuable Consultation and Engagement Tool for Infrastructure Projects – Case Study of Airspace Change for a Regional Airport

2023· article· en· W7064222719 on OpenAlexaffvenue

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian acoustics · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectromagnetic Compatibility and Measurements
Canadian institutionsArup Group (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAviationAircraft noiseNoise controlProcess (computing)SustainabilityDroneNoise (video)Public transportWind power
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Since the late 1990s, Arup has developed and used auralisation capability to inform the design of some of the world’s best arts and culture venues. Through Arup SoundLabs around the world, clients, designers, major stakeholders and the general public have been able to take informed decisions by experiencing the acoustic implications of designs as they are developed. More recently, auralisation technology has been developed to simulate sound generation and propagation during planning and design for a broad range of infrastructure projects, such as High Speed 2 railway, A66 highway and Heathrow airspace change and expansion in UK; Texas Central High Speed railway and LADoT Advanced Air Mobility (AAM) policy in US; and a wind farm development in Tasmania. The aviation industry is currently introducing new disruptive technologies principally to improve its sustainability performance. The introduction of electric aircraft and delivery drones are likely to revolutionize regional airspace, creating new opportunities for regional airports. Although it is possible to achieve lower noise levels for these new vehicles compared to traditional light aircraft, the sound characteristics (for example tonality and high pitch due to electric motors) and their potential for higher traffic, could give rise to concerns about noise being more noticeable and disturbing to local communities than the current situation. This paper will present the auralisation methodology, successfully applied to a regional UK airport, to address public concerns and assist in the local authority planning process for an airport development masterplan. Through a series of sound demonstrations, members of the public and stakeholders could experience and judge for themselves, the impacts of the proposed airspace and infrastructure changes (such as new types of aircraft, modification of flight paths and increased air traffic).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.043

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0050.003
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0020.006
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.106
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian acousticsSame topicElectromagnetic Compatibility and MeasurementsFrench-language works237,207