Auralisation: A Valuable Consultation and Engagement Tool for Infrastructure Projects – Case Study of Airspace Change for a Regional Airport
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Since the late 1990s, Arup has developed and used auralisation capability to inform the design of some of the world’s best arts and culture venues. Through Arup SoundLabs around the world, clients, designers, major stakeholders and the general public have been able to take informed decisions by experiencing the acoustic implications of designs as they are developed. More recently, auralisation technology has been developed to simulate sound generation and propagation during planning and design for a broad range of infrastructure projects, such as High Speed 2 railway, A66 highway and Heathrow airspace change and expansion in UK; Texas Central High Speed railway and LADoT Advanced Air Mobility (AAM) policy in US; and a wind farm development in Tasmania. The aviation industry is currently introducing new disruptive technologies principally to improve its sustainability performance. The introduction of electric aircraft and delivery drones are likely to revolutionize regional airspace, creating new opportunities for regional airports. Although it is possible to achieve lower noise levels for these new vehicles compared to traditional light aircraft, the sound characteristics (for example tonality and high pitch due to electric motors) and their potential for higher traffic, could give rise to concerns about noise being more noticeable and disturbing to local communities than the current situation. This paper will present the auralisation methodology, successfully applied to a regional UK airport, to address public concerns and assist in the local authority planning process for an airport development masterplan. Through a series of sound demonstrations, members of the public and stakeholders could experience and judge for themselves, the impacts of the proposed airspace and infrastructure changes (such as new types of aircraft, modification of flight paths and increased air traffic).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it