MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7064329595

Challenges to Personal Information Sharing in Interorganizational Settings: Learning from the Quebec Health Smart Card Project

2008· article· en· W7064329595 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueScholarship@Western (Western University) · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicParticle Detector Development and Performance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInformation systemHealth careProcess (computing)Order (exchange)Hindsight biasPerspective (graphical)Information sharingResistance (ecology)Dimension (graph theory)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

DEPLOYMENTS of national health information infrastructures (NHII) are slowly spreading throughout the world. Because they span organizational boundaries and involve many parties with different strategie interests, they are considered interorganizational systems (IOS). The body of literature on IOS poses problems for the health care sector since the latter usually encompasses more types of stakeholders than the usual users and suppliers, its information systems contain sensitive information and it is not driven by profit. Moreover, the conventional MIS models have not been adapted quite yet to account for this more complex reality. Studies about NHII infrastructures have offered fragmented results so far. In this research, I address this gap in the literature by examining what happened during the pre-implementation phase of the Quebec Health Smart Card project, a provincial health infrastructure project which lasted close to 15 years. In order to achieve this, I use Pierre Bourdieu’s Theory of Practice and Bruno Latour’s Actor-Network-Theory. These sociological methods allow me to investigate the process that unfolded over the years with a critical eye so that in addition to answering usual questions such as who participated, what their concerns were and how the debate took place, I am addressing questions such as why it happened that way. The different perspective offered by these alternative theories provided good hindsight to refine resistance to change and user participation (MIS) models so that they reflect more accurately situations in interorganizational settings. Also, it fostered interesting thoughts about the similarities between private and public sector’s information systems. Finally, it engendered three statements that can be applied to other situations and/or other sectors that share certain similarities with the case studied. In addition to these benefits to MIS researchers, the present result can also help practitioners in managing the still ongoing provincial health infrastructure project, now renamed Quebec’s Health Record. This is important since recent events proved that most issues and protagonists taking part in the controversy are the same as before, that the same history seems to be repeating.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.670

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.096
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it