MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7065829463

Family mapping of previously identified patients with pathogenic or likely pathogenic ALPL variants using predictive genotyping and detailed phenotyping approach: the FAME case-control study

2025· article· en· W7065829463 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueWhite Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Polarization and Ellipsometry
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHypophosphatasiaGenotypingParathyroid hormoneGenotypeGenetic testingPedigree chartGenetic variation
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hypophosphatasia (HPP) is an inborn error of metabolism caused by loss-of-function variants in the ALPL gene, which encodes the tissue nonspecific isozyme of alkaline phosphatase (ALP). There is no typical phenotype in adults. We used a genotyping first approach to determine whether ALPL pathogenic variants were associated with musculoskeletal symptoms, mineral metabolism abnormalities, and an impact on quality of life. We recruited individuals with a pathogenic (or likely pathogenic) variant in ALPL gene (n = 26) and their relatives (n = 44). We performed genetic tests and compared the relatives with positive (n = 20) and negative (n = 24) genetic test. We applied standard questionnaires and physical tests (Brief Pain Inventory [BPI]; Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis [WOMAC]; Modified Hypophosphatasia Impact Patient Survey; Short Form of 36 Survey [SF-36]; and the Short Physical Performance Battery). In fasting blood samples, we measured creatinine, calcium, phosphate (P), parathyroid hormone (PTH), ALP, bone ALP, 25OHD-, 1,25(OH)2D, CTX, type 1 procollagen N-terminal peptide (PINP), osteocalcin, and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase5b (TRACP5b). Relatives with positive genetic test had lower ALP (IU/L) [32.5(12.8) vs 87.8(32.6) p < .001], bone ALP (ng/mL) [6.3(4.3, 9.8) vs 17.5 (13.12-25.7) p < .001], PTH (pg/L) [28.6(20.6, 38.1) vs 40.05(25.7, 52.3) p = .03], and higher PLP(nmol/L) [162.0 (91.75, 337.5) vs 37.5 (18.25, 60.5) p < .001] and P(mmol/L) [1.36 (0.18) vs 1.05 (0.2) p < .001]. We did not find significant differences in fractures or musculoskeletal features between the groups. Greater pain scores were observed on BPI in relatives with positive genetic tests, and bone and muscle pain were more often reported by this group, but statistical tests were not significant. No differences were found in physical performance or quality of life. In conclusion, we assessed relatives of individuals with pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in the ALPL gene regardless of the presence of signs and symptoms. Biochemical abnormalities were more common in gene-positive relatives, but the prevalence of musculoskeletal symptoms was comparable in relatives with positive and negative genetic tests.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWhite Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York)Same topicOptical Polarization and EllipsometryFrench-language works237,207