MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7066136371

Glazed Ceramics from Karakorum : The Distribution and Use of Chinese Ceramics in the Craftsmen Quarter of the Old-Mongolian Capital During the 13th–14th Century A. D.

2018· dissertation· en· W7066136371 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

Venuebonndoc (University of Bonn) · 2018
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEurasian Exchange Networks
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAssemblage (archaeology)Capital (architecture)Quarter (Canadian coin)GermanDistribution (mathematics)Excavation
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This is a material based study aiming to supplement and extend the knowledge about daily life in the first Mongolian capital, Karakorum, during the 13th and 14th century with a focus on the city’s connections within the Mongol Empire.<br /> The materials analyzed are glazed ceramics excavated from the centre of Karakorum during summer campaigns in the years 2000–2005. The excavations are part of the Mongolian German Karakorum Expedition (MDKE) conducted by Prof. Dr. H. Roth and Dr. E. Pohl from the University of Bonn. Recorded for this study are 21164 fragments of various wares. As there is no pre-existing system of classification that can be applied to the entire assemblage of ceramics found, their distinctive features are defined according to methods of European standards for the study of medieval ceramics. Second to the definition of the criteria for the documentation of the glazed ceramics is their classification. It is worked out that most of the ceramics derive from production sites in modern day northern China. Furthermore, southern Chinese ceramics and few Central Asian wares are documented. Resulting from the classification of the glazed ceramics and their determination of origin is a chorological analysis of the routes of supply that are implied by the provenances of the wares. This is of interest as the distribution of Chinese ceramics on continental routes is a subject of discussion. Ceramics are generally listed as trade goods on the maritime Silk Road but not on the traditional continental routes. Although it is known that the Old-Mongolian capital is linked to the famous Mongolian postal relay system across Eurasia, further connections to the city and its supply throughout the political changes of the time is not fully researched yet. The nature of glazed ceramics as possible trade goods over land is analyzed through its use and distribution in Karakorum. Moreover, a comparison with the ceramics from contemporaneous sites is provided. This is Jininglu and Yanjialiang. Both of which are located in Inner Mongolia. <br /> Overall, this study provides the basis for working with glazed ceramics found in Karakorum. For the first time, these findings are correlated to a stratigraphy. Through this study continuative research on connections across China, resp. Eurasia, during the 13th to 14th century is enabled.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.638
Threshold uncertainty score0.982

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it