MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7070301592

Operations & Maintenance Simulation for Tidal Energy Converters:

2018· report· en· W7070301592 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueRepository hosted by TU Delft Library (TU Delft) · 2018
Typereport
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOperabilityTidal powerTurbineMarine energyRenewable energySubmarine pipelineOffshore wind powerWind powerCurrent (fluid)Tidal current
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

he Netherlands is establishing its own test and development centre for marine energy: the Dutch Marine Energy Centre (DMEC), in order to facilitate essential real sea experience. However, realistic simulations in software is also important: helping avoid expensive failures, plan costs and choose vessels and equipment for offshore renewable energy farms. ECN O&M Calculator is a time domain simulation tool used to model different Operations & Maintenance (O&M) strategies for offshore wind farms and to compute the corresponding KPIs. This has been converted to be useful for tidal current energy farms, through the following adaptations: 1. An updated user interface; 2. Use of tidal currents and weather at multiple locations for operability assessment of vessels; 3. More flexible and multiple shift patterns to use short, changing access periods at slack tide; 4. Separation between deterministic tidal currents and uncertain waves for simulation, and use of tidal currents-instead of wind-for turbine performance; 5. Inclusion of a powerful weather simulator to improve understanding of long-term variability of KPIs. This new tool is applied to case studies through working closely with Tocardo International BV, a developer of tidal current energy turbines based at Den Oever, The Netherlands. The expected performance of their planned test projects, at FORCE in Canada and EMEC in Scotland, are assessed in terms of costs and availability, based on the planned O&M strategy. Subsequently, improved O&M strategies for these projects are explored through simulations. At FORCE, waiting on spares and waiting for vessels to complete long transits have a significant impact on farm performance. The 15-year average availability using the baseline O&M strategy is 69.2%, costing 5.08 M$/year. By applying a stock control to two spare parts, the availability increases to 90.7% (yield) while the costs increase to 5.88 M$/year. Further, the planned number of three standby speedboats is unnecessary, and can be reduced to one. At EMEC, a similar result is found, where stock control and improving the speed of the tug boats can significantly improve performance. The baseline O&M strategy results in average availability of 68.7%, costing 0.25M£/year. By contrast, the best strategy found gives an availability of 84.4%, costing 0.32M£/year.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.304
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.005
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0030.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it