MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7071898902

Understanding the psychosocial determinants of STD risk among Winnipeg street-involved youth

2004· dissertation· en· W7071898902 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueMspace (University of Manitoba) · 2004
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWetland Management and Conservation
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersHealth Canada
KeywordsPsychosocialChlamydiaSexually transmitted diseasePublic healthDisease controlReproductive healthInterpersonal communicationExplanatory power
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The elimination of gonorrhoea and a significant reduction in chlamydia are proposed as national goals that Canada should achieve by the year 2010 (Health Canada, 1997). Already the national incidence of gonorrhoea has declined by 27% and chlamydia by 66% since 1991 (Health Canada, 1998a). However, the overall rates are influenced by very high rates in certain vulnerable segments of the population, such as youth living away from their parents/guardians (Health Canada, 1998b). Because of their high STD rates, these street-involved youth are a priority for STD prevention programmes. Understanding more about the determinants of STD risk within this group is a necessary step in reducing sexual risk-taking activities and, consequently, STD rates. In an attempt to provide information on the sexual health and sexual behaviours of Canadian street youth, the Laboratory Centre for Disease Control (LCDC, Health Canada; now the Centre for Infectious Disease Prevention and Control (CIDPC; circa 2001)) developed the Enhanced STD Surveillance in Canadian Street Youth project. This national, multi-centre, cross-cultural surveillance system represents the first time that a Canadian national body has examined the prevalence of STD and the determinants of sexual risk behaviours among Canadian street-involved youth, The current study used structural equation modelling to test the explanatory power of a tri-partite model incorporating the constructs of personal attributes, behavioural repertoire, and interpersonal environment on STD risk. It was found that a model including self-esteem, perception of risk, abuse history, relationship with parents, current alcohol use, and current illicit drug use explained a significant portion of the variance in STD risk, as defined by (a) current frequency of condom use, (b) number of recent sexual partners, (c) past and current incidence of chlamydia, gonorrhoea, and/or hepatitis B, and (d) use of used injection drug use equipment. These results suggest that STD risk among street-involved youth is a complex social problem that requires a comprehensive prevention framework regarding determinants of health.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.818
Threshold uncertainty score0.811

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it