Analysis of consolidation with constant rate of displacement
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
© 2016, National Research Council of Canada. All Rights Reserved. The “constant rate of strain” consolidation test has been widely used for several decades to provide a continuous load–displacement response. An exact theoretical solution can be obtained for this consolidation problem. Two other solution techniques have pedagogic advantage in their simplicity, and in their ability to (i) clarify the phases of response of the consolidating sample and (ii) be extended to incorporate additional details of material response or testing configuration. The parabolic isochrone technique imposes a particular mode shape on the isochrones at all times. Treating the sample as a single system, and applying the boundary conditions at the system level, the governing equation becomes an ordinary differential equation. For more elaborate soil properties or experimental procedures a finite difference description of the problem is readily programmed and solved. These solution techniques are used to illustrate the importance of distinguishing between the observed response of the system — the soil specimen under test — and the behaviour of the soil elements that make up this system. Examples are given of erroneous conclusions that might be drawn if this distinction is not recognised.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it