MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7075730100

Stocktaking of the Housing Sector in Sub-Saharan Africa : Challenges and Opportunities

2015· report· en· W7075730100 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe World Bank Open Knowledge Repository (World Bank) · 2015
Typereport
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicTheoretical and Computational Physics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUrbanizationPaceInvestment (military)PopulationPopulation growthQuarter (Canadian coin)Quality (philosophy)MegacityUrban planning
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Africa is rapidly urbanizing and will
\n lead the world’s urban growth in the coming decades.
\n Currently, Africa is the least‐urbanized continent,
\n accommodating 11.3 percent of the world’s urban population,
\n and the Sub‐Saharan region is the continent’s
\n least‐urbanized area. However, the region’s cities are
\n expanding rapidly, by 2050; Africa’s urban population is
\n projected to reach 1.2 billion, with an urbanization rate of
\n 58 percent (UN‐HABITAT 2014). With this rate of growth,
\n Africa will overtake Asia as the world’s most rapidly
\n urbanizing region by 2025 (UN 2014). Although the nature and
\n pace of urbanization varies among countries, with over a
\n quarter of the world’s fastest growing cities, Africa is
\n undergoing a massive urban transition. Globally, cities are
\n major drivers of economic growth, and the quality and
\n location of housing has long-term consequences for inclusive
\n growth. However, in Sub-Saharan Africa, urbanization is not
\n accompanied by the level of per-capita economic growth or
\n housing investment that is observed elsewhere in global
\n trends. Incomes in Sub‐Saharan Africa (SSA) have not kept
\n pace with urbanization, which, in many African countries,
\n has not necessarily been accompanied by industrial growth
\n and the structural transformation as has occurred in other
\n regions. Housing stocks, along with investment and
\n employment in related construction and finance industries,
\n constitute a major component of national economic wealth.
\n The key challenge for African cities, however, has been the
\n comparatively low growth in per‐capita income, which limits
\n the resources that households have to consume or invest in
\n housing. At the same time across the region, the formal
\n channels through which quality housing is produced and
\n financed face major constraints that limit access to a large
\n share of urban households. Hence, the formal housing sector
\n is only a small part of the economy because the construction
\n and finance services have very little effective demand,
\n evidenced by the lack of formal investment in housing across
\n the region. Recent studies have found that in Africa, formal
\n housing investment (in national current accounts data) lags
\n behind urbanization by nine years (Dasgupta et al. 2014).
\n Furthermore, the capital investment in infrastructure needed
\n to handle rapid urbanization typically happens (if at all)
\n after housing has already been built, often in informal settlements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.949
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.105
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it