MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7077072284 · doi:10.4236/jpee.2025.138001

A Performance Evaluation of Machine Learning Models for Solar PV Power Forecasting in Bamenda, Cameroon

2025· article· en· W7077072284 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Power and Energy Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersWest African Science Service Centre on Climate Change and Adapted Land UseInternational Development Research Centre
KeywordsPhotovoltaic systemMean squared errorArtificial neural networkIntermittencyWind powerPopulationSustainabilityEnergy (signal processing)Solar energy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Facing increased energy demand which surpasses national grid supply capacity due to rapid population growth, urbanization, and economic activities, developing countries such as Cameroon are deploying solar photovoltaic power (SPVP) systems to supplement their energy needs; with these systems heralded for sustainability and environmental friendliness. However, the inherent intermittency of SPVP is a major concern since it cannot reliably fill the supply-demand gap with its associated risk of non-availability. Tackling this issue requires adequate forecasting of SPVP to guarantee better management of the energy shortfall. This study evaluates the performance of twenty-four machine learning models (MLMs) in forecasting SPVP in Bamenda, Cameroon. The study uses data from Photovoltaic Geographical Information System with six input features (direct beam irradiance, diffuse irradiance, reflected irradiance, sun height, ambient temperature, and wind speed) and training-testing split of 80% - 20% to forecast SPVP as output feature. Employing hold-out and re-substitution validation techniques, MLMs performance was evaluated using Coefficient of Determination (R2) and Root Mean Squared (RMSE) metrics. Results reveal wide neural network model as the overall best performer with R2 of 0.999 and RMSE of 9.377, compared to the other models with same or lower R2 and higher RMSE ranging from 9.4522 to 458.97. This model was used to perform short-term SPVP forecast in Bamenda and may be used in the forecast of SPVP in geographically similar areas of Cameroon. This study underscores the role and importance of MLM performance evaluation to identify the best-yield model for SPVP to reliably fill supply-demand gaps.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.666
Threshold uncertainty score0.289

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it