MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7080969848

The Efficacy of Virtual Group Coaching on the Self-Determination of People with Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome

2025· article· en· W7080969848 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Medicine Forum · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoachingPsychosocialQuality of life (healthcare)Intervention (counseling)Health coachingPsychological interventionAffect (linguistics)Social support
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTIONThe Ehlers-Danlos Syndromes (EDS) are a family of 13 genetic connective tissue disorders that affect negatively physical and psychosocial health which in turns have been found to decrease their quality of life and self-determination (Baeza-Velasco et al., 2019; Bennet et al., 2021; Estrella & Fraizer, 2024; Tinkle et al., 2017; Palomo-Toucedo et al., 2020). Limited supports and services, including occupational therapy, are available for those with EDS (Estrella & Frazier, 2024; McDonald et al., 2023; Reychler et al., 2021). Those with EDS have requested better services to support their self-determination (Estrella & Frazier, 2024). Coaching has shown positive impacts on self-determination in adults with chronic conditions within and outside of occupational therapy (Kessler & Graham, 2015; Nott et al., 2021; McCusker et al., 2016). Group coaching is a novel intervention demonstrating positive outcomes on self-determination but has not yet been investigated within occupational therapy or with those with EDS (Fainstad et al., 2022; Losch et al., 2016; Mbokota and Reid, 2022). OBJECTIVESThe aims of this pilot study were two-fold: (1) determining the feasibility of utilizing virtual group coaching with adults with EDS; and (2) exploring the impact of virtual group coaching on self-determination in adults with EDS. METHODSA purposeful sample of 8 adults with hypermobile EDS living in the United States was recruited through videos posted on social media sites frequented by those with EDS. Two groups of 4 adults each received 10 sessions of synchronous virtual group coaching with a trained coach. Feasibility was assessed after group completion by participants answering the Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM), the Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM), and the Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM). The impact of group coaching on self-determination was assessed pre and post group coaching using the Sense of Belonging Instrument (SOBI), the General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSE), the Relationship Closeness Scale (RC), and the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM); all self-report measures. Interferential statistical analysis and descriptive analysis were performed. Note: This pilot study was conducted in parallel to the study conducted by Alana Scalzo’s The Efficacy of Virtual Group Coaching on the Self-Determination of Adults with Spinal Cord Injury and used the same methodology except for recruitment. RESULTSFeasibility scores were above the pre-determined cut-off of 3 across all three measurement tools (AIM m=4.72 (SD=0.45), IAM m=4.81 (SD=0.40), FIM m=4.97 (SD 0.17)]. In terms of impact on self-determination, the results were mixed. SOBI-P scores and RC scores in relation to peers showed a statistically significant improvement (p< 0.05) following group coaching. Clinically significant positive changes on the RC in relation to peers were demonstrated as well for 37.5% of the participants’ COPM scores for both Performance and Satisfaction. CONCLUSION In terms of feasibility, participants found group coaching to be acceptable, implementable, and feasible. Preliminary results demonstrated statistically significant impacts of virtual group coaching on sense of belonging and relationship closeness in a sample of 8 participants with EDS. Adults with EDS can experience flare-ups, as is suggested by decrease in scores experienced by some participants in this study. With a small sample size, these flare-ups complicated that outcome analysis. Further studies in group coaching for the EDS population should be considered with larger sample size and the ability to measure flare-ups separately from outcome measures. Synopsis: A small study of group coaching with 8 adults with Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome was conducted. Group coaching was deemed feasible, appropriate, and acceptable to implement by the participants. Positive changes were seen in the sense of belonging and relationship closeness of the coaching peers. Study participants responded positively to group coaching especially in terms of sense of belonging and relationship closeness. Close to 40% of participants reported a positive change in their daily lives following group coaching. Further studies should be done to further explore the impact of group coaching on adults with Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome. Acknowledgments: Dr. Namrata Grampurohit from Thomas Jefferson University

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.817
Threshold uncertainty score0.232

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it