MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7081925242 · doi:10.1155/dth/2247169

The Impact of Hidradenitis Suppurativa on Sexual Health: A Systematic Review

2025· article· en· W7081925242 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueDermatologic Therapy · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHidradenitis suppurativaSexual dysfunctionErectile dysfunctionQuality of life (healthcare)DistressDiseasePsychological distressMEDLINEPeyronie's disease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory skin condition that significantly impacts patients’ quality of life, particularly in relation to sexual health. Sexual dysfunction and erectile dysfunction are frequently reported among individuals with HS. However, the relationship between disease severity and sexual health outcomes remains unclear. This systematic review aims to explore the impact of HS on sexual dysfunction in both males and females, examining the physical and psychological factors involved. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Medline (OVID), and Web of Science using keywords related to HS and sexual health, including “sexual dysfunction,” “sexual desire,” “erectile dysfunction,” “impotence,” and “infertility.” Studies were screened for relevance, and those that examined sexual health outcomes in HS patients were included. Thirteen studies met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed qualitatively due to the heterogeneity of the outcome measures. Nonrandomized studies were evaluated using the Newcastle‐Ottawa Scale to assess methodological quality. Results: The review found that sexual dysfunction was prevalent in HS patients, with rates ranging from 42% to 71.8%. Female patients consistently reported higher levels of sexual distress, while male patients experienced erectile dysfunction at significant rates, as measured by the FSFI and IIEF. Importantly, worsening disease severity did not consistently correlate with increased sexual dysfunction, suggesting that factors such as pain, odor, and psychological distress may have a greater influence. Conclusion: This review demonstrates that HS significantly impacts sexual health, though the severity of HS does not always correlate with worsening sexual dysfunction. Psychological factors, pain, and genital involvement appear to play a more prominent role. Future research should focus on addressing both the psychological and physical aspects of sexual dysfunction in HS patients and explore the underlying mechanisms linking HS to infertility.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.979
Threshold uncertainty score0.321

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it