MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7083306305 · doi:10.22329/uwdj.v1i1.8271

Effectiveness of Using NamePrism to Identify Ethnicities

2023· article· en· W7083306305 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueUWill Discover Journal · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Topology and Set Theory
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
FundersUniversity of Windsor
KeywordsEthnic groupStatistical analysisDependency (UML)Ethnic origin

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The dependency on NamePrism as an algorithm to identify the ethnicity of individuals using their names has been increasing in research publications. Therefore, it is crucial to determine whether or not NamePrism is a reliable tool for determining ethnicities. Using a database of 335 Chief Executive Officers (CEOs), we used NamePrism to identify the ethnicity of each of those CEOs. The picture of each CEO was examined in addition to their biography to determine the ethnicity while relying on multiple entries given in the Excel database, such as the company name, start and end date of the CEO’s tenure, and the CEO’s full name. Lastly, statistical analysis of the collected results determined that NamePrism is not an accurate tool to determine the ethnic background of CEOs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.312
Threshold uncertainty score0.378

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.076
GPT teacher head0.436
Teacher spread0.360 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it