MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Multi-objective optimization of nanogrids for remote telecom base stations in Canada

2025· article· en· W7083582979 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueComputers & Electrical Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMunicipal Solid Waste Management
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
FundersÉcole Centrale de LyonRégion Hauts-de-FranceInstitut National des Sciences Appliquées de LyonCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesUniversité Grenoble AlpesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversité de SherbrookeCanada Research ChairsIndian National Science Academy
KeywordsBase stationRenewable energyDiesel fuelSnowLimitingSnow removalMinificationBenchmark (surveying)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The telecommunications sector targets net-zero emissions by 2050, yet many remote Canadian base stations rely on diesel generators, incurring high costs and emissions. Most hybrid renewable energy system (HRES) studies overlook snow accumulation, limiting relevance in northern climates. This work proposes a snow-aware hybrid nanogrid for a telecom base station in Dorval Lodge, Quebec, using bifacial PV modules, lithium iron phosphate (LFP) batteries, and a diesel generator. A preliminary HOMER Pro study showed 99% renewable penetration is technically possible but at high cost and without snow, bifacial, or aging effects. We developed a high-fidelity model including hourly snow coverage, seasonal albedo, battery aging, and diesel fuel emission behavior. A joint multi-objective optimization minimizing life cycle cost (LCC) and annual CO 2 under L P S P < 0 . 0001 % was solved using a Controlled Elitist NSGA-II algorithm. Three stages were tested: baseline, fixed controls, and monthly adaptive controls. The adaptive strategy achieved the largest gains, cutting CO 2 by 18.59% and LCC by 5.26% versus baseline, with the most sustainable setup using 856 L/year (2.93 t CO 2 ). Sensitivity analysis showed snow-aware designs avoid up to 40.9% higher LCC and 139.7% more CO 2 seen in snow-unaware cases. Integrating climate-specific snow modeling with adaptive controls enhances economic and environmental performance, offering a robust, transferable solution for remote telecom power in harsh climates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.782
Threshold uncertainty score0.950

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it