MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Multi-objective optimization of nanogrids for remote telecom base stations in Canada

2025· article· en· W7083582979 on OpenAlexafffundabout

Bibliographic record

VenueComputers & Electrical Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMunicipal Solid Waste Management
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
FundersÉcole Centrale de LyonRégion Hauts-de-FranceInstitut National des Sciences Appliquées de LyonCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesUniversité Grenoble AlpesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversité de SherbrookeCanada Research ChairsIndian National Science Academy
KeywordsBase stationRenewable energyDiesel fuelSnowLimitingSnow removalMinificationBenchmark (surveying)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The telecommunications sector targets net-zero emissions by 2050, yet many remote Canadian base stations rely on diesel generators, incurring high costs and emissions. Most hybrid renewable energy system (HRES) studies overlook snow accumulation, limiting relevance in northern climates. This work proposes a snow-aware hybrid nanogrid for a telecom base station in Dorval Lodge, Quebec, using bifacial PV modules, lithium iron phosphate (LFP) batteries, and a diesel generator. A preliminary HOMER Pro study showed 99% renewable penetration is technically possible but at high cost and without snow, bifacial, or aging effects. We developed a high-fidelity model including hourly snow coverage, seasonal albedo, battery aging, and diesel fuel emission behavior. A joint multi-objective optimization minimizing life cycle cost (LCC) and annual CO 2 under L P S P < 0 . 0001 % was solved using a Controlled Elitist NSGA-II algorithm. Three stages were tested: baseline, fixed controls, and monthly adaptive controls. The adaptive strategy achieved the largest gains, cutting CO 2 by 18.59% and LCC by 5.26% versus baseline, with the most sustainable setup using 856 L/year (2.93 t CO 2 ). Sensitivity analysis showed snow-aware designs avoid up to 40.9% higher LCC and 139.7% more CO 2 seen in snow-unaware cases. Integrating climate-specific snow modeling with adaptive controls enhances economic and environmental performance, offering a robust, transferable solution for remote telecom power in harsh climates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.295
Threshold uncertainty score0.593

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueComputers & Electrical EngineeringSame topicMunicipal Solid Waste ManagementFrench-language works237,207