MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7084081216 · doi:10.3390/geotechnics5030056

Predicting Efficiency and Capacity of Drag Embedment Anchors in Sand Seabed Using Tree Machine Learning Algorithms

2025· article· en· W7084081216 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueGeotechnics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Kidney Injury Research
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEmbedmentRandom forestDecision treeSeabedEnsemble learningSubmarine pipelinePredictive modellingBearing capacity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Drag embedment anchors (DEAs) play a vital role in maintaining the stability and safety of offshore structures, including floating wind turbines, oil rigs, and marine renewable energy systems. Accurate prediction of anchor performance is essential for optimizing mooring system designs, reducing costs, and minimizing risks in challenging marine environments. By leveraging advanced machine learning techniques, this research provides innovative solutions to longstanding challenges in geotechnical engineering, paving the way for more efficient and reliable offshore operations. The findings contribute significantly to developing sustainable marine infrastructure while addressing the growing global demand for renewable energy solutions in coastal and deep-water environments. This current study evaluated tree-based machine learning algorithms, e.g., decision tree regression (DTR) and random forest regression (RFR), to predict the holding capacity and efficiency of DEAs in sand seabed. To train and validate the results of machine learning models, the K-fold cross-validation method, with K = 5, was utilized. Eleven geotechnical and geometric parameters, including sand friction angle (φ), fluke-shank angle (α), and anchor dimensions, were analyzed using 23 model configurations. Results demonstrated that RFR outperformed DTR, achieving the highest accuracy for capacity prediction (R = 0.985, RMSE = 344.577 KN) and for efficiency (R = 0.977, RMSE = 0.821 KN). Key findings revealed that soil strength dominated capacity, while fluke-shank angle critically influenced efficiency. Single-parameter models failed to capture complex soil-anchor interactions, underscoring the necessity of multivariate analysis. The ensemble approach of RFR provided superior generalization across diverse seabed conditions, maintaining errors within ±10% for capacity and ±5% for efficiency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.935
Threshold uncertainty score0.578

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it