MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7084122867 · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.30022153

Digital Currencies, Energy Security, and Environmental Challenges: A G7 Perspective

2025· article· en· W7084122867 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicNonlinear Differential Equations Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCryptocurrencyEnergy securityMoney launderingRenewable energyConsumption (sociology)Digital currencyEnergy consumptionPerspective (graphical)Terrorism

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article presents a comprehensive analysis of the impact of cryptocurrencies on the economic and environmental security of the G7 countries, exploring both the potential risks and prospects. The study focuses on the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, France, Germany, Italy, and Japan, offering a detailed exploration of the increasing adoption of cryptocurrencies in these nations. Despite the benefits such as enhanced financial inclusion and cross-border transaction efficiency, cryptocurrencies pose significant challenges, including their use in illicit activities like money laundering and terrorism financing. The research critically examines the substantial energy consumption associated with certain cryptocurrency mining processes, particularly Proof-of-Work mechanisms, and their consequent environmental impacts, including carbon emissions, electronic waste, and air pollution. It investigates the corresponding energy policies and regulatory responses emerging within the G7 to address these concerns, alongside the development of more energy-efficient alternatives like Proof-of-Stake and the push for renewable energy in mining. The article critically examines these dual aspects, highlighting the measures implemented by regulators and policymakers to mitigate risks. It also delves into the evolving landscape of Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) and their potential role in enhancing financial system efficiency and security, including considerations for their energy footprint. The study employs a robust methodological framework, combining statistical analysis of market trends, case studies, and policy analysis to provide a balanced view of the current state and future trajectory of cryptocurrencies in the G7 countries. By offering a nuanced understanding of both the opportunities and threats posed by digital currencies, including their energy and environmental dimensions, this article contributes to the ongoing discourse on their integration into global financial systems and their implications for sustainable economic security.<br>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.967
Threshold uncertainty score0.985

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it