MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7090429304 · doi:10.18254/s207987840036156-0

Calendar Styles and Church Feasts in Patrick Gordon's “Diary”

2025· article· en· W7090429304 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueIstoriya · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies of British Isles
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGermanQuarter (Canadian coin)Style (visual arts)Period (music)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Diary of the Scottish General Patrick Gordon, one of Peter the Great's mentors, written in Old English, is an important source on the history of Russia. and a number of European countries in the second half of the 17th century. In 2000—2018, D. G. Fedosov (1962—2024) published the Old English text of all 6 volumes of the Diary and its translation into Russian. An analysis of the ways of dating events in the Diary (calendar styles used by the author, church feasts mentioned, days of commemoration of Orthodox and Catholic saints) brought new data on the history of the Catholic community of the German Quarter (Sloboda) in the 80s — 90s of the 17th century, and it also allowed us to identify one of the possible sources that Gordon used in his Diary: Ein- und Dreyssig Jährige Calender-Prob ... Vom Jahre 1670 biß ins Jahr 1700 ... von Johann Henrich Voigt ... zu Staden. Hamburg [S.l.]: Rebenlein, [ca. 1674].

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.642
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it