MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7092300247 · doi:10.13031/ja.16324

Pellet Production from Municipal Solid Wastes Under Various Parametric Conditions in a Cold Canadian Climate

2025· article· en· W7092300247 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the ASABE · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicComposting and Vermicomposting Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAlberta InnovatesGovernment of Alberta
KeywordsPelletizingPelletsDurabilityPelletMoistureMunicipal solid wasteHeat of combustionRefuse-derived fuel

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Highlights Three wastes of varying sizes were pelletized in a flat-die machine at two moisture levels. SSOs have higher density; RDFs show greater durability in pellet form. Higher MC raises RDF durability but lowers bulk density and increases fines. Pellet durability increases with screen size at 15% moisture content, though RDF decreases. SSO pellets show 15% lower SEC than RDF at 8% MC and 4 mm screen size. ABSTRACT. As municipal solid waste (MSW) volumes continue to rise, the valorization of its organic fractions through densification techniques is crucial for sustainable waste management and energy recovery. In cold-climate regions like Edmonton, Alberta, challenges remain in pelletizing heterogeneous waste streams directly sourced from municipal facilities. This study investigates the pelletization behavior of three MSW streams—digestate from anaerobic processes (DAP), source-separated organics (winter) (SSO w ), and refuse-derived fuel (RDF)—using a lab-scale flat plate die mill. Feedstocks were processed at three screen sizes (4, 8, and 12 mm) and two moisture contents (10% and 15%) through a 6 mm die. RDF and SSO pellets exhibited high durability (>96%), while DAPs failed to form durable pellets because of their high ash content and low higher heating value (HHV). RDF pellets achieved a peak HHV of 21.49 MJ kg -1 , twice that of DAP (10.07 MJ kg -1 ), while SSOs showed seasonal variation (13.88 to 19.47 MJ kg -1 ). The lowest specific energy consumption (SEC) was observed for 10% MC SSO at 4 mm (256.99 kJ kg -1 ) and for 15% MC RDF at 8 mm (1432.69 kJ kg -1 ). Pellet bulk density reached 594 kg m -3 for RDF and 730 kg m -3 for SSOs at 10% MC. Throughput capacity decreased with increasing screen size, with 12 mm RDF at 10% and 15% MC yielding the lowest rates (6.99 and 12.20 kg hr -1 , respectively). These findings reveal optimal pelletization parameters and key data for scaling RDFs and SSOs, supporting thermochemical conversion and circular waste-to-energy strategies. Keywords: Digestate, Grinding, Municipal solid waste, Pelletization, Refuse-derived fuel, Source-separated organics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.633
Threshold uncertainty score0.974

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it