MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7093095180 · doi:10.1080/09699082.2025.2548063

“Who Shall Paint Anger?”: Emma Lyon and the Claims of Anger in Early Nineteenth-Century England

2025· article· en· W7093095180 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueWomen s Writing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistory of Emotions Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnger

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Emma Lyon, one of the first Jewish poets in England, published a volume of poetry in 1812, Miscellaneous Poems, which provides a fine forum for understanding the subtle engagement with the passions, especially anger, negotiated by Anglo-Jewish women authors of the early nineteenth century. Lyon’s approach to anger is situated within a complicated genealogy, one which proscribes anger, especially for women, but which recognizes the authority of divine wrath and its implications in human interactions. In early nineteenth-century England, when Jewish women occupied a complicated position with respect both to men in their own community and to the wider, mainstream culture, the validity of women’s anger is marked by a remarkable ambivalence, in which self-control must often be put in the service of angry engagement. Lyon finds nuanced ways of registering and expressing anger even as she sets herself to the poetic task of addressing cultural misperceptions about Jewish anger and women’s experience.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.772
Threshold uncertainty score0.593

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it