MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7093704837

Unexpected Ecological Effects of Distributing the Exotic Weevil, <i>Larinus planus</i> (F.), for the Biological Control of Canada Thistle

2002· article· W7093704837 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueInsecta mundi · 2002
Typearticle
Language
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBiological Control of Invasive Species
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThistleWeevilBiological pest controlIntroduced speciesInvasive speciesLimiting
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rhinocyllus conicus, a weevil introduced for biological control of exotic weeds, has had major nontarget ecological effects on native thistles. Some practitioners have argued that this is an isolated case. We report, however, that another Eurasian weevil (Larinus planus), currently being distributed in North America for the control of Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense), is significantly reducing seed production by a native thistle (Tracy’s thistle, Cirsium undulatum var. tracyi) in Colorado. In 1999 we discovered L. planus feeding in flower heads of Tracy’s thistle near a 1992–1993 biocontrol release site. Of the heads collected, 74% had evidence of L. planus, and these heads produced only 1.1 viable seeds on average, compared with 45.9 in heads without this weevil. In 2000 we investigated whether L. planus feeding persisted on Tracy’s thistle and whether this feeding affected seed production significantly. Feeding by L. planus occurred on 80% of the plants and in 76% of all the main heads of Tracy’s thistle. Flower heads with L. planus averaged 1.4 viable seeds, compared with 44.5 in uninfested heads. Feeding by L. planus decreased the average number of viable seeds produced per plant by over 51%. In contrast, L. planus had less effect on its targeted exotic host, Canada thistle than it did on Tracy’s thistle. The high-frequency and high-level feeding of L. planus on the native species, coupled with the lack of evidence of its effectively limiting the seed production or density of Canada thistle suggest that the deliberate distribution of this weevil entails a high risk-to-benefit ratio and should be discontinued. Our findings challenge the general assumption that biological control with exotic insects is consistent with conservation goals of weed management in natural areas. Effective, a priori quantitative evaluation of the potential effects on both target and nontarget species and better regulatory oversight are required. Resumen: Efectos Ecológicos Inesperados de la Distribución del Gorgojo Exótico, Larinus planus (F.), para el Control Biológico del Cardo de Canadá: Rhinocyllus conicus, un gorgojo introducido para el control de hierbas exóticas, ha tenido importantes efectos ecológicos en cardos nativos. Sin embargo, algunos profesionales han argumentado que este es un caso aislado. Reportamos que otro gorgojo eurasiático (Larinus planus), que actualmente está siendo distribuido en Norte América para el control del Cardo de Canadá (Cirsium arvense), esta reduciendo significativamente la producción de semillas de un cardo nativo (Cirsium undulatum var. tracyi) en Colorado. En 1999 descubrimos a L. planus alimentándose de flores de C. undulatum cerca de un sitio de liberación de biocontrol en 1992–1993. De las flores recolectadas, el 74 % tenía evidencia de L. planus y estas flores produjeron solo 1.1 semillas viables en promedio, en comparcaión con 45.9 en flores sin este gorgojo. En 2000 investigamos si persistía la alimentación de L. planus en el cardo nativo y si esto afectaba la producción de semillas significativamente. El forrajeo de L. planus ocurrió en el 80% de las plantas y en el 76% de las flores del cardo nativo. Las flores con L. planus promediaron 1.4 semillas viables, comparadas con 44.5 en flores no infestadas. El forrajeo de L. planus disminuyó el número promedio de semillas viables producidas por planta en más del 51%. En contraste, L. planus tuvo menor efecto en su hospedero exótico, C. arvense, que en el cardo nativo. La alta frecuencia y nivel de L. planus alimentándose de la especie nativa, aunado a la falta de evidencia de algún efecto sobre la producción de semillas o la densidad de C. arvense, sugieren que la distribución deliberada de este cardo conlleva una alta proporción de riesgo a beneficio y debe descontinuarse. Nuestros resultados desafían la suposición general de que el control biológico con insectos exóticos es consistente con las metas de conservación del manejo de arbustos en áreas naturales. Se requieren evaluaciones cuantitativas efectivas, a priori, de los efectos potenciales tanto en especies blanco como no blanco, así como mayor vigilancia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.953
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.160 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it