MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7094440999

From the Editors

2017· article· W7094440999 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Medicine Forum · 2017
Typearticle
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIrish and British Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInterprofessional educationCurriculumFeelingExperiential learningValue (mathematics)Health professionsCenter (category theory)Health care
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Here at JCIPE, another semester has flown by. And again, the Center has been busy expanding and integrating our programs on campus and beyond. This fall, as we welcomed our tenth cohort into the Jefferson Health Mentors Program, we introduced a revised curriculum which is more heavily focused on the social determinants of health and integrates the Social Ecological Model. We also added an eighth profession, Medical Laboratory Sciences, to the mix, expanding our total student enrollment to more than 1400 students! Building on this foundation, this fall we also expanded our more advanced interprofessional TeamSTEPPS® training program. During the course of four workshops, the Center and 16 volunteer interprofessional facilitators from four different professions led 554 students from five professions through simulated case scenarios through which they applied their TeamSTEPPS® skills. Though reportedly pushed outside their comfort zones, students described learning valuable lessons about teamwork, effective communication, leadership, experiential learning and the value of working with other professions. They also reported feeling better prepared for clinicals and “real-world” scenarios. Check out some student feedback in this edition! As many of you know from having joined us, we hosted our fifth biennial conference on October 28 and 29. One hundred seventy attendees hailed from Canada, Israel and 27 different states. Our keynotes addressed issues of global interprofessional education and practice; the history of Medicare and its impact on our ability to deliver patient-centered, interprofessional care; and the importance of teams in maximizing value in healthcare. A range of oral and poster presentations showcased the advancement of interprofessional education and practice, with innovative pilots becoming integrated with more depth and breadth. Along the lines of this theme, the Journal of Interprofessional Education & Practice (JIEP) plans to publish a special conference edition this spring featuring works from the conference and John H. V. Gilbert, C.M., Ph.D., LLD (Dalhousie), FCAHS as guest editor. Finally, many congratulations to Deirdre Yarosh, MA, a Jefferson Pharmacy student, who received JIEP’s Student Award for her peer paper presentation “Examining Health Mentor Perceptions of Student Teamwork.”

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.811
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0130.008
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it