MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7094491543

Uxoricidas

2002· article· W7094491543 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueDigital Commons - Trinity University (Trinity University) · 2002
Typearticle
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGender, Health, and Social Inequality
Canadian institutionsTrinity College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQualitative analysisPublic lifeChurch history
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La figura del uxoricida aparece en muchas literaturas nacionales, pero la comedia española presenta tantos argumentos en que el marido mata a su esposa que llega a ser un verdadero subgénero. El uxoricidio es tan importante dentro de la historia literaria de la época que algunos han llegado a declarar, equivocadamente, que la matanza de una mujer representaba fielmente cierta peculiaridad del carácter nacional español, sobre todo cuando se trataba también del honor. Es verdad que la autoridad legal de matar a una esposa adúltera aparece en el Fuero juzgo, pero ya no estaba en vigor en el siglo XVII, y la sociedad ya había cambiado de la tradición medieval del castigo personal a un sistema moderno y burócrata de fiscales y tribunales que dispensaban un castigo social y anónimo. Hay unas cuantas comedias que tienen raíces históricas, como Los comendadores de Córdoba, pero muchos datos indican que los casos verdaderos de uxoricidio no ocurrían frecuentemente, y que, si un hombre mató a su esposa, casi siempre fue castigado.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.837
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.007
Science and technology studies0.0080.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.004
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.097
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.166 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it