i FIRST PLACE WINNER: Quebec Section i Effects of Dye Substantiv
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
n dyeing cotton with fiber reactive 1 dyes, the addition of alkali to the dyebath not only promotes formation of the covalent bond between the dye and the cellulose but also causes hydrolysis of the reactive group of the dye. Unfixed hydro-lyzed dye remaining in the fabric after the dyeing process must be removed by wash-ing, otherwise the optimal fastness to washing and crocking of the final fabric will not be realized. The batch dyeing process thus consists of three stages: The migration phase. In this first stage, the cotton is treated with dye solution in the presence of salt a t about pH 6, but little reaction with the cellulose occurs. The dye is free to migrate from the more heavily to the lightly dyed areas of Fiber reactive dyes for cotton were shown to vary widely in their substan-tivity for the fiber. Substantivity also depended on dyebath temperature and salt concentration, as expected. The relative substantivities of the hydrolyzed forms of the reactive dyes were assessed in the laboratory by means of a simple, quick and inexpensive paper chrom-atography test. Correlation of the sub-stantivity of the dye with the amount removed from the cotton under various washing conditions indicated that it should be possible to select higher or lower washing temperatures based on the substantivity of the dye to be re-moved. In addition, the paper chroma-tography test was useful for quick selection of dyes of about the same substantivity. Mixtures of such dyes dyed cotton with little change in hue during the dyeing process; dyes of different substantivity gave pronounced color changes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it