Unconventional Treatment Options in Severe Asthma: An Overview
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT- In Canada, asthma is the leading cause of admission in hospital. About of 80 % of the death from asthma is preventable. Severe asthma is defined as a patient with persistent symptoms despite the use of adequate controller therapy, including multiple courses of oral glucocorticosteroids. However, about 10 % of patients with severe asthma remain poorly controlled despite optimal treatment and these patients have the greatest morbidity and mortality. The management of refractory severe asthma remains extremely challenging. For patients with refractory severe asthma, the adjunct therapies recommended by national guidelines only included oral glucocorticosteroid and anti-IgE antibody (omalizumab) therapy. Currently, there is limited published literature on the unconventional treatments such as methotrexate, cyclosporine, gold and antimicrobials treatments, for refractory severe asthma. The objective of this review article is to provide an updated therapeutic overview of unconventional treatment options for refractory severe asthma. This article is open to POST-PUBLICATION REVIEW. Registered readers (see “For
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it