Conference: The Role of Health Promotion in the Transition of the Nordic Welfare States was held in
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
conference was to focus on and share results from ongoing Nordic as well as international research in health promotion. The conference themes reflected current aspects of changes in research and work within health promotion locally, nationally and internation-ally. The Nordic School of Public Health, NHV, hosted the conference. www.nhv.se/hpconference09. The Ottawa Charter (1986) and the seven princi-ples of Rootman et al. (2001) were the guiding principles for the conference presentations [1–3]. The action means of the Ottawa Charter are to build healthy public policy, create supportive environ-ments, strengthen community action, develop per-sonal skills and re-orient health services. The seven key principles of Rootman et al. are empowerment, participation, holism, intersectorality, equitability, sustainability and multistrategy. In order to reach a greater audience both in the Nordic countries and outside some of the researchers who participated in the conference were asked to write scientific articles that covered the theme they presented at the conference. The results are in this Supplement to the Scandinavian Journal of Public Health. A way to understand health promotion is to look upon the research in the field. The action means from the Ottawa Charter are touched upon in the articles. Vallgårda and Ollila address the concepts of building of a healthy public policy and re-orientation of health services. Vallgårda concludes that there is no common Nordic political approach to public health, and Ollila argues that health in all policies is necessary and that implementation of intersectoral health poli-cies in practice remains challenging. Thorlindsson speaks of multistrategy and argues for the necessity to develop a transdisciplinary approach that integrates various elements from different disciplines and various levels of analysis. Johansson and Tillgren discuss whether there are financial incentives of collaborating organizations and illustrate with two examples. Torp,
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it