MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7104267222 · doi:10.23977/acss.2025.090317

Power Load Forecasting Method Combining Informer Model and ACO Optimization Algorithm

2025· article· W7104267222 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in Computer Signals and Systems · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicEnergy Load and Power Forecasting
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHyperparameterAnt colony optimization algorithmsScheduling (production processes)Stability (learning theory)Process (computing)Hyperparameter optimizationElectric power systemPower (physics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study proposes a power load forecasting method that combines the Informer model with the Ant Colony Optimization (ACO) algorithm. ACO optimizes the hyperparameters of the Informer model, significantly improving the model's accuracy and stability in power load forecasting. The Informer model utilizes its ProbSparse Attention technology to efficiently process long-term time series data and capture long-term dependencies in power load variations. ACO optimizes hyperparameter combinations through global search, avoiding the limitations of manual parameter tuning. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed model outperforms traditional LSTM and TCN models across multiple evaluation metrics, demonstrating greater stability and prediction accuracy, particularly during peak load periods. This method provides effective technical support for smart grid scheduling and resource optimization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.614
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it