Region Embedding With Adaptive Correlation Discovery for Predicting Urban Socioeconomic Indicators
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A recent trend in urban computing involves utilizing multi-modal data for urban region embedding, which can be further expanded in a variety of downstream urban sensing tasks. Many previous studies rely on multi-graph embedding techniques and follow a two-stage paradigm: first building a k-nearest neighbor graph based on fixed region correlations for each view, and then blending multi-view information in a posterior stage to learn region representations. However, multi-graph construction and multi-graph representation learning are not associated in most existing two-stage studies, and the relationship between them is not leveraged, which can provide complementary information to each other. In this paper, we unify these two stages into one by constructing learnable weighted complete graphs of regions and propose a new one-stage Region Embedding method with Adaptive region correlation Discovery (READ). Specifically, READ comprises three modules, including a disentangled region feature learning module utilizing a city-context Transformer to encode regions' semantic and mobility features, and an adaptive weighted multi-graph construction module that builds multiple complete graphs with learnable weights based on disentangled features of regions. In addition, we propose a multi-graph representation learning module to yield effective region representations that integrate information from multiple graphs. We conduct thorough experiments on three downstream tasks to assess READ. Experimental results demonstrate that READ considerably outperforms state-of-the-art baseline methods in urban region embedding.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".