MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7110519914

Factors affecting athletic trainers' and therapists' knowledge and confidence in emergency management

2025· article· en· W7110519914 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueSHAREOK (University of Oklahoma; Oklahoma State University; Central Oklahoma University) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicAthletic Training and Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCompetence (human resources)Knowledge levelHealth careLow ConfidenceConfidence intervalDelphi methodScope of practiceLimitingEmergency managementRehabilitation
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Athletic trainers and therapists (ATTs) are healthcare professionals who specialize in the prevention, assessment, and rehabilitation of injuries. Once certified, they are required to maintain their knowledge via continuing education (CE) to maintain proficiency. However, knowledge has been shown to decay in healthcare professionals, including ATTs, at alarming rates. Confidence in actual knowledge (AK) has been shown to remain even when knowledge decays, indicating an overestimation of perceived knowledge (PK) signifying a knowledge gap. Mandatory CE is limited to Emergency Cardiac Care (ECC) or Basic Life Support (BLS) and does not include the wide scope of emergency management used by ATTs. This study aimed to determine factors affecting ATTs’ knowledge and confidence in three content areas of EM. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted involving 315 ATTs in the United States and Canada (age=36.87±9.96, males=135, females=171, other gender=9, ATC=137, CATC=87, dual certified=89). Participants completed demographic information, pre- and post-test confidence measures, and a knowledge assessment surrounding ECC/BLS, patient assessment (Assessment), and airway management with supplemental oxygen (Airway&O2). The survey was validated by a Delphi method and obtained a CVI of 0.99 and a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.974. Various non-parametric statistical methods were employed to analyze the data, with an alpha of p=.05. Results: Results indicate mandatory CE is effective in limiting knowledge decay and AK increases with years certified, with varying significance between content areas. Airway&O2 demonstrated the lowest confidence and competence scores. Higher AK scores were better correlated with more accurate self-assessment. Confidence was not heavily influenced by completing a knowledge assessment; thus, most ATTs were found to be unconsciously incompetent in emergency management. Additionally, a knowledge gap was determined based on the poor correlation between confidence and competence scores throughout. Conclusions: Mandatory CE works to slow knowledge decay in ATTs and those with more knowledge are better able to self-assess their perceived knowledge and rate their confidence. As such, ATTs should aim to regularly practice self-evaluation to identify areas of weakness, and to seek frequent CE that enhances their knowledge within a variety of content areas to ensure clinical proficiency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.064
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it