MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7113899293 · doi:10.1109/ojvt.2025.3642721

Impacts of Electric Vehicle Integration on Transportation and Energy Systems: Case Study in Iran

2025· article· en· W7113899293 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Open Journal of Vehicular Technology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectric Vehicles and Infrastructure
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFlexibility (engineering)Work (physics)Energy (signal processing)Electric vehicleEnergy managementSustainable transportModernization theoryRenewable energyEnergy planningEnergy modeling

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Electric vehicles (EVs) have the potential to revolutionize the energy and transportation sectors, yet widespread adoption faces challenges, notably the complexity of managing energy demand. While prior studies have modeled EV impacts in developed economies, little work has analyzed such impacts under the constraints of fossil fuel-dominated, subsidy-heavy systems like Iran. So, this paper investigates the impacts of EV integration on Iran's energy and transportation infrastructure, advocating that EVs are instrumental in decarbonizing and grid balancing. Our focus turns to Iran's energy landscape as a compelling case study for a fossil-fuel-rich country, due to its specific geographical aspects and unique energy sector challenges. The study extensively analyses historical peak demand data and national statistics, underscoring the urgent need for more sustainable energy management practices and the modernization of transportation systems. The analysis emphasizes the critical challenge posed by surging peak power demand in Iran while highlighting the pivotal role that EVs could play in reshaping Iran's transportation and energy sectors. Numerical analysis reveals that managing EV energy through V1G and V2G can help alleviate the peak demands, providing a flexible alternative to traditional network upgrades. Moreover, the calculated estimates of peak power demand for unconstrained charging versus the impact of V1G and V2G can assist decision-makers in assessing future energy flexibility requirements, identifying strategies to overcome potential barriers to EV adoption, and exploring different scenarios.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.195
Threshold uncertainty score0.401

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it