MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7114897761 · doi:10.3390/h14120240

‘The Road Was in Ireland’: Modernist Ecologies of Estrangement in Elizabeth Bowen’s Short Fiction

2025· article· en· W7114897761 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueHumanities · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIrish and British Studies
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScholarshipReading (process)RomanceAlienationEcocriticismFeelingClose reading

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Attending to Elizabeth Bowen’s environmental descriptions in her short fiction, including her landscapes, weather, flora, and fauna, reveals a modernist ecological sensibility. In stories such as ‘Summer Night’ and ‘Human Habitation,’ Bowen’s characters find themselves estranged from the kinds of attachment to place fostered by a national ecological imaginary. While Bowen’s own nationality, and the effect of her Anglo-Irish class and heritage on her writing, has been a central area of consideration for many scholars, this essay offers an ecocritical reading of her short stories and argues that these works interrogate the viability of national ecologies to help understand the experiences of her characters within a modern world. Whether they find themselves in Ireland or in England, Bowen’s characters inhabit a world that perpetually leads to feelings of detachment and alienation from the terms of belonging and place that underlie such national ecologies. By building on the recent modernist and ecocritical turn in scholarship on Elizabeth Bowen, this essay argues that her short stories challenge the explanatory qualities of romantic national ecologies by instead evoking a modernist ecology of estrangement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.096
Threshold uncertainty score0.191

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0100.033
Scholarly communication0.0060.005
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHumanitiesSame topicIrish and British StudiesFrench-language works237,207