MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7115036269

Moving frames, Bäcklund’s theorem, and its affine extension

2025· dissertation· en· W7115036269 on OpenAlexafffund

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2025
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicMathematical Analysis and Transform Methods
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersMcGill University
KeywordsAffine transformationExtension (predicate logic)Affine combinationAlgebra over a fieldSet (abstract data type)Focus (optics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The sine-Gordon equation (SGE) is a partial differential equation which has received renewed interest in recent decades due to its connections to the physical phenomenon of solitons.Of particular interest to geometers is a well-established correspondence between solutions to the SGE and pseudospherical surfaces.Elaborating on the work of Chern and Terng [CT80], this thesis rederives an appropriate Bäcklund transformation, allowing for the generation of new Euclidean pseudospherical surfaces from known ones.In doing so, we make use of the geometric structure of pseudospherical line congruences.Taking advantage of the aforementioned correspondence, we then demonstrate how known solutions to the SGE enable the discovery of novel ones.The thesis proceeds to consider an analogous procedure for surfaces in affine space, replacing the notion of a pseudospherical line congruence with the more abstract notion of a Weingarten congruence.This consideration then allows for the generalization of Bäcklund's theorem and the Euclidean integrability theorem to affine space.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)Same topicMathematical Analysis and Transform MethodsFrench-language works237,207